|
POLITICS |
||
|
COVER: BIOGRAPHY: Sandy Scofield: Native Songstress BUSINESS: Duty
to Consult Now Legal Duty For Provincial Crown and Third Parties OIB
Demands Meeting With Weyerhaeuser
MODERN TREATIES:
Federal
Court Ruling Grants Tax Immunity to Treaty 8 Peoples HUMOUR:
|
Referendum
Ballots Go Out to BC Electorate BC
Attorney General Geoff Plant tabled the eight questions to be asked in
the mail-in referendum ballot on treaty negotiation principles on March
13, in the provincial legislature. Union of BC
Indian Chiefs president Chief Stewart Phillip was quick to denounce the
referendum questions as seeking a mandate to perpetuate the same outdated
colonial relationship BC First Nations have always had with the provincial
government. "As First
Nations we have a unique constitutional relationship with the provincial
and federal governments. The referendum questions presented today demonstrate
a complete and utter disregard and denial of our constitutional relationship,"
said Chief Phillip. Two million
ballots containing the eight questions will be mailed out to the BC electorate
beginning April 2, and citzens will have until May 15, to return their
ballots. "In the
end, what matters is not how many people vote. It is that people can vote
to help shape this future," Premier Gordon Campbell told the legislature. That night in an interview on the public affairs talk show Voice of the Province, A.G. Geoff Plant defended the referendum as a conversation directly with the BC electorate. He said that the referendum has nothing to do with trying to undermine constitutionally protected rights. Plant argued
that the referendum will give the BC Liberals a renewed mandate from the
people that will help move the treaty process forward. Plant went on to
explain that because the referendum is being conducted under the Referendum
Act, there has only to be a majority of 50 percent plus one on any question
is binding on the government and has to be implemented. First Nations
Summit leader Bill Wilson phoned in to comment, "These people have
opened up a house of ill repute
Let's get on with negotiations,
building a better future. For him to say that he thinks he knows what's
best for Indians is simply a repetition of the old assumption that white
people know what's best for Indians." Wilson said
that all the referendum process is doing is giving racists in the province
a legitimate platform to make racist statements. Tactics
include: In a legal analysis, aboriginal
rights lawyer Louise Mandell points out that the provincial government
lacks the jurisdictional authority to implement the results of the referendum. First, unextinguished aboriginal title, which is a burden on Crown title, can only be lifted by a treaty with the federal government. Second, provincial legislative power is limited by the federal government's exclusive jurisdiction over Indians and lands reserved for them. Third, the provincial legislative
power is limited by the fiduciary relationship between the Crown and aboriginal
peoples. In other words, governments must act in the best interests of
aboriginal peoples and ensure a fair process if and when aboriginal people
enter into a treaty. "When read in light of
the recent court decisions of Taku River Tlingit and the Haida, the Mandell
Analysis clearly shows that the province does not have the power to proceed
unilaterally with any attempt to implement the results of the referendum.
"Clearly, the referendum questions seek a self-serving mandate to perpetuate an outdated ,economically racist and colonial relationship, of which many features have been repudiated by the courts," said Chief Phillip. Proposed treaty referendum
questions Do you agree that the provincial government should adopt the following principles to guide its participation in treaty negotiations? 1. Private property should
not be expropriated for treaty settlements. |
|